General
ADT v. E. KIRSTEIN SONS CO.
259 F. 561·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ADT v. E. KIRSTEIN SONS CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 25, 1919.)
No. 188.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
Suit by Leo F. Adt against the E. Kirstein Sons Company. From a decree for defendant (259 Fed. 277), complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Church & Rich, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellant.
Davis & Simms, of Rochester, N. Y. (C. Schuyler Davis and Percival D. Oviatt, both of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.
Before WARD, ROGERS, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.