General

Iceline Wilson et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Prazza et al., Appellants

306 A.D.2d 467762 N.Y.S.2d 255·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2003·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Iceline Wilson et al., Respondents, v Joseph Prazza et al., Appellants. [762 NYS2d 255] [MAJORITY] —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated September 20, 2002, as denied their motion to preclude an expert from testifying at trial. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Since summary judgment on the merits has been awarded to the defendants in a companion appeal (see Wilson v Prazza, 306 AD2d 466 [2003] [decided herewith]), the instant appeal has been rendered academic. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.