Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES, 1873 — 154 U.S. 590 · caselaw · US
General
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES
154 U.S. 59038 L. Ed. 1089·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. '
No. 97.
Submitted February 10, 1873.
—
Decided March 3, 1873.
Pico v. United States, 2 Wall. 279, and Peralta v. United States, 3 Wall. 434, followed.
Mr. S. O. Houghton for appellant.
Mr. Attorney General for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
I am instructed to say that the decree in the Circuit Court for the District of California is affirmed on the authority of Pico v. United States, 2 Wall. 279, and Peralta v. United States, 3 Wall. 434. It is not thought necessary to do more than to refer to these cases. Affirmed.