Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Bartels, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 570 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Bartels, Appellant
184 N.Y. 570·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Bartels, Appellant.
People v. Bartels, 110 App. Div. 922, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 26, 1906;
decided March 13, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 6, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a change of venue.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was unauthorized.
Robert J. Burritt for motion.
William A. Oowie opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.