Contracts · MBE-tested
George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
33 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1929
Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 6, 1929.
No. 18.
George Martin, pro se.
Frank Lee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl.
Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.
Affirmed.