Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al. v. WEBB'S CITY, INC., 1964 — 376 U.S. 190 · caselaw · US
General
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al. v. WEBB'S CITY, INC.
376 U.S. 190·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al. v. WEBB’S CITY, INC.
No. 362.
Decided February 17, 1964.
Robert L. Carter, Fred G. Minnis and Richard Feder for petitioners.
D. M. Patrick for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Petitioners’ motion to advance is denied. On respondent’s suggestion of mootness, the judgment of the District Court of Appeals of Florida, Second District, is vacated and the cause remanded to that court for appropriate proceedings to effectuate respondent’s representation that the injunction below will be set aside, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to move to vacate today’s order in the event the injunction is not promptly vacated by the trial court.