Contracts · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Application of The Carleton Company, Inc., for an Order Summarily Discharging of Record the Alleged Liens Filed in the Offices of the Comptroller of the City of New York and of the Board of Transportation of the City of New York by Ottar R. Oigarden (Also Known as Otto Berg) and Others against Moneys Due and to Become Due under a Contract between the Carleton Company, Inc., and The City of New York, Known and Designated in the Finance Department of the City of New York as No. 92964; In the Matter of the Application of The Carleton Company, Inc., for an Order Summarily Discharging of Record Alleged Liens, etc., re Gustav Theodorsen and Others
240 A.D. 955·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Carleton Company, Inc., for an Order Summarily Discharging of Record the Alleged Liens Filed in the Offices of the Comptroller of the City of New York and of the Board of Transportation of the City of New York by Ottar R. Oigarden (Also Known as Otto Berg) and Others against Moneys Due and to Become Due under a Contract between the Carleton Company, Inc., and The City of New York, Known and Designated in the Finance Department of the City of New York as No. 92964. In the Matter of the Application of The Carleton Company, Inc., for an Order Summarily Discharging of Record Alleged Liens, etc., re Gustav Theodorsen and Others
No. 97874.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.