Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis Pilier, Appellant
199 A.D.2d 1076608 N.Y.S.2d 901·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Pilier, Appellant.
[608 NYS2d 901]
[MAJORITY]
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that the waiver by defendant of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Defendant has raised no "categories of appellate claims” that survive his waiver (People v Callahan, supra, at 280; see, People v Myers, 195 AD2d 1076). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.