Administrative
Joseph Schestauber, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant
112 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Schestauber, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 18, 1888;
decided January 15, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 19,1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered on a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edwa/rd S. Rapadlo for appellant.
Stephen R. Jabots for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur. .
Judgment affirmed.