Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1966 — 382 U.S. 373 · caselaw · US
General
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
382 U.S. 373·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 662.
Decided January 17, 1966.
Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. William M. Moloney, Hugh B. Cox, William H. Allen and James A. Bistline for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al. to be added as parties appellee is granted.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.