General
Earl W. Elliott, Respondent, v. Datus Clark and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Datus Clark & Sons, and Ernest Delorme, Appellants
228 A.D. 871·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Earl W. Elliott, Respondent, v. Datus Clark and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Datus Clark & Sons, and Ernest Delorme, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the finding that the defendants were negligent was against the weight of the evidence; and for errors in the charge. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur.