Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Gabriel I. MARTIN, Respondent
29 A.3d 266·District of Columbia Court of Appeals·2011·DC
BEFORE: OBERLY, Associate Judge, STEADMAN and KING, Senior Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re Gabriel I. MARTIN, Respondent.
No. 11-BG-852.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Oct. 6, 2011.
BEFORE: OBERLY, Associate Judge, STEADMAN and KING, Senior Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM]
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Florida suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of three years, this court’s July 28, 2011 order directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline in the form of a three-years suspension with a condition of fitness should not be imposed, the statement of respondent consenting to reciprocal discipline, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar Rule XI § 14(g) affidavit filed on August 29, 2011, it is
ORDERED that, Gabriel I. Martin, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of three years, nunc pro tunc to August 29, 2011.