Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel Wisotzkey, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 532 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel Wisotzkey, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fire Insurance Company, Appellant
189 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Wisotzkey, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.
Wisotzkey v. Niagara Fire Ins. Go., 112 App. Div. 599, affirmed.
(Argued June 13, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 11, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintilf, entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.
Horace McGuire for appellant.
F. A. Robbins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.