General
Carson M. Simon & Company v. United States, protests 320842-K, etc. (Philadelphia); Morris Friedman v. United States, protests 321749-K, etc. (Philadelphia); Morris Friedman et al. v. United States, protests 59/29762,etc. (Philadelphia); Morris Friedman v. United States, protests 59/29788, etc. (Philadelphia); Rice Bayersdorfer Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/19191, etc. (Philadelphia)
59 Cust. Ct. 900·United States Customs Court·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
October 31, 1967
No. P67/370.
No. P67/371.
No. P67/372.
No. P67/373.
No. P67/374.
Carson M. Simon & Company v. United States, protests 320842-K, etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman v. United States, protests 321749-K, etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman et al. v. United States, protests 59/29762,etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman v. United States, protests 59/29788, etc. (Philadelphia). Rice Bayersdorfer Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/19191, etc. (Philadelphia).
[MAJORITY — Beckworth, J.]
Beckworth, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bags or baskets in chief value of rush similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.