Contracts · MBE-tested
RAINWATER et al. v. FLORIDA
390 U.S. 196·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RAINWATER et al. v. FLORIDA.
No. 18.
Decided March 4, 1968.
Alfred L. Scanlan and J. Edward Worton for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the court below is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39. Cf. Hoffa v. United States, 387 U. S. 231; Kolod v. United States, ante, p. 136.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.