Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George W. Bergen et al., Appellants, v. John M. Hitchings, Respondent, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 619 · caselaw · US
General
George W. Bergen et al., Appellants, v. John M. Hitchings, Respondent
162 N.Y. 619·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, J J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. Bergen et al., Appellants, v. John M. Hitchings, Respondent.
Bergen v. Hitchings, 22 App. Div. 395, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 15, 1900;
decided March 20, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made November 30, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report óf a referee, and granting a new .trial.
Horace Secor, Jr., for appellants.
Hector M. Hitchings for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion. ;;
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, J J.