Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Trustees of the University Magazine Company for a Voluntary Dissolution. Ruford Franklin, as Receiver, Appellant; American Surety Company, Respondent, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of Trustees of the University Magazine Company for a Voluntary Dissolution. Ruford Franklin, as Receiver, Appellant; American Surety Company, Respondent
187 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Trustees of the University Magazine Company for a Voluntary Dissolution. Ruford Franklin, as Receiver, Appellant; American Surety Company, Respondent.
Reported below, 83 App. Div. 641.
■ (Argued February 18, 1907;
decided February 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, entered May 8, 1903, which reversed, an order of Special Term denying a motion for an order directing the receiver to pay a certain sum of money to the respondent herein and granted such motion.
The motion was made upon the ground that the undertaking' was not served within the required time.
Rutherford Towner for motion.
McDougall Hawkes opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied.