Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Utah Fuel Co. et al. v. National Bituminous Coal Comm'n et al., 1939 — 306 U.S. 620 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Utah Fuel Co. et al. v. National Bituminous Coal Comm'n et al.
306 U.S. 620·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 528.
Utah Fuel Co. et al. v. National Bituminous Coal Comm’n et al.
April 3, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the decree entered in this case on January 30, 1939, be amended by striking out the third paragraph and substituting the following:
“On consideration whereof, It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this Court that the decree of the said Court of Appeals affirming' the decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia dismissing the bill be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the grounds stated in the opinion of this Court.”
It is -further ordered that the mandate in this case be recalled and amended in accordance with this order.