Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Head, doing business as Lea County Publishing Co., et al. v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry, 1963 — 372 U.S. 939 · caselaw · US
General
Head, doing business as Lea County Publishing Co., et al. v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry
372 U.S. 939·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 392.
Head, doing business as Lea County Publishing Co., et al. v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry.
Ellis Lyons, Leonard J. Emmerglick and Harold Kohn on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Mexico. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 371 U. S. 900.) The motion of the American Optometric Association, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.