Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rodney George, Appellant
292 A.D.2d 464738 N.Y.S.2d 880·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2002·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney George, Appellant.
[738 NYS2d 880]
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 8, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of whether the trial court erred in permitting a witness to testify without meeting the requirements of CPL 60.25 (see, People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029, 1031; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, the defendant’s attempt to apply CPL 60.25 to the circumstances here is misplaced, as no witness identification of the defendant was involved (see, CPL 60.25; People v Bayron, 66 NY2d 77).
The defendant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court (see, People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 777; People v Kalaj, 247 AD2d 633, 634). S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.