General
PORT OF BROOKINGS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
376 U.S. 647·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PORT OF BROOKINGS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Terser for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.