General
Michael Hakal, Respondent, v. Edward W. Jackson and Charles Anderson Phillips, Appellants
224 A.D. 858·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Hakal, Respondent, v. Edward W. Jackson and Charles Anderson Phillips, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the November term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.