Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gale Kindlesparker, 1918 — 246 U.S. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gale Kindlesparker
246 U.S. 657·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 263.
Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gale Kindlesparker.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for ■the Sixth . Circuit.
Argued April 24, 25, 1918.
Decided April 29, 1918.
Mr. Stuart E. Knappen and Mr. Frank E. Robson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles F. Hext and Mr. H. Monroe Dunham for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs, and case remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of. Michigan for further proceedings, upon the authority of Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, 242 U. S. 353.