General
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen of America v. Southern Railway Co.
389 U.S. 958·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
The Chief- Justice, Mr. Justice Fortas, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the writ for the reasons stated in the dissent in Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific R. Co., 385 U. S. 157, 168 (1966).
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 511.
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen of America v. Southern Railway Co.
Charles T. Boyd, Harold C. Heiss and Donald W. Bennett for petitioner.
Charles A. Horsky for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief- Justice, Mr. Justice Fortas, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the writ for the reasons stated in the dissent in Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific R. Co., 385 U. S. 157, 168 (1966).