Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Fredenburgh et al., Appellants, v. Silas Saxton, Sheriff, etc., Respondent, 1879 — 78 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Fredenburgh et al., Appellants, v. Silas Saxton, Sheriff, etc., Respondent
78 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Fredenburgh et al., Appellants, v. Silas Saxton, Sheriff, etc., Respondent.
(Arguecl September'24,1879;
decided October 7, 1879.)
Disposed of on the facts in the case.
J. JSTewlon Fiero for appellants.
Wm. iS. Kenyon for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Ter Guriam]
Ter Guriam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.