Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Enos B. Wood, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, Appellant, et al., Defendants, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
Enos B. Wood, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, Appellant, et al., Defendants
124 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Enos B. Wood, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
(Submitted March 20, 1891;
decided April 14, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 25, 1890, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
W. A. Sutherland for appellants.
Cassius C. Davy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of Crowninshield v. Bd. of Suprs. of Cayuga Co. (ante, p. 583).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.