Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Allendorph, Respondent, v. John A. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1886 — 101 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
William Allendorph, Respondent, v. John A. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
101 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Allendorph, Respondent, v. John A. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued January 25, 1886;
decided February 9, 1886.)
The questions presented in this case were as to the reception and rejection of evidence; they were disposed of principally in view of the facts.
George P. Lawton for appellant.
James Lansing for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.