Property · MBE-tested
VACUUM ENGINEERING CO. v. DUNN
218 F. 991·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1914
Before LACOMBE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
VACUUM ENGINEERING CO. v. DUNN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 9, 1914.)
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Edwin J. Prindle and Arthur Wright, both of New York City, for appellant. L. F. H. Betts, of New York City, for appellee.
Before LACOMBE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an application to recall the mandate (209 Fed. 219, 126 C. C. A. 313), to admit as part of the record certified copies of certain foreign patents, and to issue a new mandate thereon, similar to the one in the suit of Patents Selling Company against this same defendant ([D. C.] 204 Fed. 99), where the same patents were in like manner introduced. To do this will undoubtedly be equitable, and since there is no technical, nor indeed any other, objection made to the granting of the relief prayed for, the application is granted.