Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CAREY, STATE'S ATTORNEY OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. WYNN et al., 1978 — 439 U.S. 8 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CAREY, STATE'S ATTORNEY OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. WYNN et al.
439 U.S. 858 L. Ed. 2d 7·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CAREY, STATE’S ATTORNEY OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. WYNN et al.
No. 78-229.
Decided October 16, 1978
Together with No. 78-239, Diamond v. Wynn et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional certain sections of the Illinois Abortion Act of 1975, Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, § 81-21 et seg. (Supp. 1976). Wynn v. Scott, 449 F. Supp. 1302 (ND Ill. 1978). The District Court assumed that Illinois prosecutors would recognize and abide by the declaratory judgment and denied plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief. Id., at 1331.
The appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating certain provisions of the statute are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Title 28 U. S. C. § 1253, the jurisdictional statute under which these appeals are taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. Gerstein v. Coe, 417 U. S. 279 (1974). The declaratory judgment is appealable to the Court of Appeals, and we are informed that appeals to that court have been taken.
Appeals dismissed.
Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.