Torts · MBE-tested

MEEKS v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN & FLORIDA RAILWAY CO.

377 U.S. 40512 L. Ed. 2d 495·Supreme Court of the United States·1964

whom Mr. Justice Stewart joins,

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

MEEKS v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN & FLORIDA RAILWAY CO. No. 981. Decided June 1, 1964 Thomas J. Lewis and Thomas J. Lewis, Jr. for petitioner in No. 981. W. Graham Claytor, Jr., Charles J. Bloch, Denmark Groover, Jr. and William H. Allen for respondent in No. 981. George R. Wolf for petitioner in No. 1004. Robert Broderick for respondent in No. 1004. Together with No. 1004, Braswell, Administratrix, v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Co., on petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are reversed. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. [CONCURRING-IN-PART-AND-DISSENTING-IN-PART — Mr. Justice Harlan,] Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Stewart joins, dissenting in No. 981, and dissenting in part and concurring in part in No. 1004. These are two more negligence cases, neither of which should have been brought here since both involve only-questions of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdicts. See, e. g., my dissenting opinion in Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande W. R. Co., 375 U. S. 208, 212, and those in the cases therein cited; cf. my dissenting opinion in Eichel v. New York Central R. Co., 375 U. S. 253, 256. Feeling obliged, however, to reach the merits because the cases are before us, see my opinion in Rogers v. Missouri P. R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 559-562, I dissent from the judgment in No. 981 and concur in the judgment in No. 1004.