General
CAPEWELL v. WAECHTER et al.
245 F. 983·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CAPEWELL v. WAECHTER et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 16, 1917.)
No. 3008.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Fourth Division of the Territory of Alaska.
E. Coke Hill, of Ruby, Alaska, Louis K. Pratt, of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Orrin K. McMurray, of Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff in error.
Jas. K. Brown and McGowan & Clark, all of Fairbanks, Alaska, for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court (150 Fed. xxxiii, 79 C. C. A. xxxiii).