General
Clarence THOMPSON v. STATE
26 Ala. App. 695160 So. 925·Alabama Court of Appeals·1935·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
160 So. 925
Clarence THOMPSON v. STATE.
8 Div. 999.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
March 19, 1935.
Raymond Murphy, of Florence, for appellant.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — RICE, Judge.]
RICE, Judge.
“The procedure, practice and rules governing the Circuit Courts of- Alabama shall in all things apply to and govern the procedure and practice in the Law and Equity Court of Lauderdale County. * * * ” Loc. Acts Ala. 1931, pp. 72, 75, § 15.
The situation here is exactly (except for the nisi prius court involved) that that existed in Stewart v. State, ante, p. 78, 153 So. 296.
Upon the authority of the holding in that case, the judgment here is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.