Torts · MBE-tested
Edgar TIDWELL v. STATE
23 Ala. App. 682121 So. 926·Alabama Court of Appeals·1929·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(121 So. 926)
Edgar TIDWELL v. STATE.
(8 Div. 715.)
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
March 19, 1929.
W. W. Callahan, of Decatur, for appellant.
Charlie G. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, J.]
SAMFORD, J.
Defendant was convicted on a charge of assault to murder and appeals.
The record in this case discloses a clear case of assault to murder and a fair trial. The rulings of the court gave to the defend1 ant every right to which he was entitled. The charge of the court was full and free from error, and every refused written charge, embracing a correct principle of law, was fully covered. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Affirmed.