Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eugene TALMADGE, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Georgia, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellees, 1930 — 37 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Eugene TALMADGE, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Georgia, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellees
37 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eugene TALMADGE, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Georgia, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellees.
No. 5696.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1930.
Mark Bolding, of Atlanta, Ga., and T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Georgia (Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Howell, Heyman & Bolding, all of Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for appellant.
Jas. C. Davis, of Atlanta, Ga., and George N. Murdock, of Chicago, 111. (Lewis, Folsom & Murdock, of Chicago, 111., and Wright & Davis, of Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for appellees.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and POSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
For reasons stated in the opinion rendered by the District Judge [32 F.(2d) 904], the decree in this case is affirmed.