Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Swift & Co. v. United States; and National Biscuit Co. et al. v. United States, 1958 — 358 U.S. 837 · caselaw · US
General
Swift & Co. v. United States; and National Biscuit Co. et al. v. United States
358 U.S. 837·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 270.
No. 271.
Swift & Co. v. United States; and National Biscuit Co. et al. v. United States.
David R. Owen for petitioner in No. 270. William L. Marbury and Fred E. Campbell for petitioners in No. 271. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander, Marvin C. Taylor and Bernard Cedar-baum for the United States. E. M. Norton and M. R. Garstang filed a brief for the National Milk Producers Federation, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition for writ of certiorari.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 257 F. 2d 787.