Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William B. Millard et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, v. Edward P. Steers, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 741 · caselaw · US
General
William B. Millard et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, v. Edward P. Steers, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
158 N.Y. 741·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William B. Millard et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, v. Edward P. Steers, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued March 23, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court'in the first judicial department, entered November 18, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant Steers- entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint as to him upon the merits on trial at Special Term.
Millard v. Steers, 9 App. Div. 419, affirmed.
Eustace Gonway, Charles R. Westbrook and Charles T. Terry for appellants.
Thomas Allison for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.