General
Bimini, Inc. v. United States
18 Cust. Ct. 254·United States Customs Court·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bimini, Inc. v. United States
No. 6687.
Entry No. 745456, etc.
Invoices dated London, England, February 16, 1946, etc.
Certified February 19, 1946, etc.
Entered at New York, N. Y., March 14, 1946.
(Decided December 30, 1946)
Adolphus G. Bedley for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Cline, Judge:]
Cline, Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
(Stipulation omitted.)
On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section ■402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.