Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Garneau v. Dozier, 1879 — 100 U.S. 7 · caselaw · US
General
Garneau v. Dozier
100 U.S. 725 L. Ed. 536·Supreme Court of the United States·1879
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Garneau v. Dozier.
Por the purposes of an appeal to, or a writ of error from, this court, the tran script of the record is sufficiently authenticated, if it be sealed with the seal of the court below, and signed by the deputy clerk thereof in the name of and for his principal.
Motion io dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
This is an appeal taken by Garneau from a decree rendered in favor of thé; deféndants below, partners doing business under the firm name of Dozier, Weyl, & Co. The authentication of the transcript of the record filed here is as follows: —
“ United States oe America, \
Eastern District oe Missouri, ss. j
“ I, M. M. Price, clerk of the Circuit Court of the United States in and for the Eastern District of Missouri, do hereby certify the writing hereto attached to be a true transcript of the record, proceedings, and exhibits in case No. 560 of Joseph F. Garneau, plaintiff against Dozier, Weyl, & Co., defendants, as fully as the same remain on file and of record in said case in my office.
“In witness whereof I hereunto subscribe my name and affix the seal of said court, at office in the city of St. Louis, in said district, this seventeenth day of July, in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and seventy-seven.
[seal.] “ M. M. Price, .
“ Cleric, of said Court.
“ By T. L. Craweord,
“ Deputy"
Mr. Edward Boyd in support of the motion.
Mr. Robert JET. Parkinson, eontra.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
'Since the act of June 8, 1872 (17 Stat. 330), Rev. Stat. 558, 624, 678, authorizing the appointment of deputies of the clerks of the courts of the United States, a transcript of the record is sufficiently authenticated for the purposes of an appeal or a writ of error to this court, if it is signed by the deputy in the name of and for the clerk of the court from which the appeal comes, or to which the' writ of error is directed, and sealed with the seal of that court. The' transcript sent up' in this case comes within this rule.
Motion denied.