Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Otis E. Wood et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents, v. Franklin C. Cornell, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Otis E. Wood et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents, v. Franklin C. Cornell, Appellant
143 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Otis E. Wood et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents, v. Franklin C. Cornell, Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1894 ;
decided October 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made May 18, 1894, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
M. If. Tompkins for appellant.
Simeon Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on argument, with costs, with leave to appellant to answer in thirty days on payment of costs in that time.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.