General
James Duval et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Louisiana
239 U.S. 626·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 223.
James Duval et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Louisiana.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
Argued October 18,1915.
Decided October 25, 1915.
Mr. Edward N. Pugh and Mr. Philip S. Pugh for the plaintiffs in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; (2) Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164.
Mr. R. G. Pleasant and Mr. Daniel Wendling for the defendant in error.