Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Andrew T. PETERS, 1934 — 69 F.2d 999 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Andrew T. PETERS
69 F.2d 999·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Andrew T. PETERS.
No. 2901.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Feb. 16, 1934.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition for review of decision of the Board of Tax Appeals of August 11, 1933, in Docket No. 54,050, Andrew J. Peters v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, has been docketed and dismissed upon motion of the Commissioner (petitioner for review), assented to by counsel for Andrew T. Peters (respondent on review).
O