Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles S. QUINZEL, a Creditor of George E. Thomas, Bankrupt, Petitioner, v. Joseph P. DAY and Pauline M. Pope Day, His Wife, and Samuel J. Kaufman, Respondents, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1072 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Charles S. QUINZEL, a Creditor of George E. Thomas, Bankrupt, Petitioner, v. Joseph P. DAY and Pauline M. Pope Day, His Wife, and Samuel J. Kaufman, Respondents
59 F.2d 1072·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles S. QUINZEL, a Creditor of George E. Thomas, Bankrupt, Petitioner, v. Joseph P. DAY and Pauline M. Pope Day, His Wife, and Samuel J. Kaufman, Respondents.
No. 4868.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 7, 1932.
E. A. Merrill, of Westfield, N. J., and Smith & Slingerland, of Newark, N. J., for petitioner.
Samuel J. Kaufman, of Newark, N. J., for respondents.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Under the peculiar circumstances of this case, we think the matter involved in the decree of Judge Fake was one within his discretionary power. We therefore affirm his order appealed from.