General

Fred Demas, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Oswego Falls Pulp and Paper Company, Respondent

143 A.D. 920·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Fred Demas, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Oswego Falls Pulp and Paper Company, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted. Motion for reargument denied. Leave to appeal is granted in this case for the reason that it may be that the question of whether Caladine was exercising an act of superintendence in moving the lever which started the machinery was for the jury to pass upon.