Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Bode, Respondent, v. Henry Maiberger, Patrick Murphy et al., Appellants, Moise Geismann, Purchaser, Respondent, 1887 — 105 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick Bode, Respondent, v. Henry Maiberger, Patrick Murphy et al., Appellants, Moise Geismann, Purchaser, Respondent
105 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Bode, Respondent, v. Henry Maiberger, Patrick Murphy et al., Appellants, Moise Geismann, Purchaser, Respondent.
(Submitted March 1, 1887
decided March 8, 1887)
Edgar A. Turrell for appellants
James C. De La Mare and A P. Fitch for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal: no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.