General
Sigmund Oppenheimer, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants
129 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sigmund Oppenheimer, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 18, 1891;
decided January 20, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of' New York, entered iipon an order made February 4, 1891. which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Brainard Tolles for appellant.
L. C. Dessar for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on the ground that the question is not sufficiently raised by exception; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.