Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Louis AUERBACH, Alex Ben Auerbach, Max Leibowitz, Samuel Denner, Rosalind Trading Corporation, Wilson Warehouse Corporation, Harry Dressbold, Kalman Tenner, Louis Leibowitz, Sol H. Bernstein, John Doe, and Richard Roe, Appellants, 1931 — 47 F.2d 1086 · caselaw · US
Corporations
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Louis AUERBACH, Alex Ben Auerbach, Max Leibowitz, Samuel Denner, Rosalind Trading Corporation, Wilson Warehouse Corporation, Harry Dressbold, Kalman Tenner, Louis Leibowitz, Sol H. Bernstein, John Doe, and Richard Roe, Appellants
47 F.2d 1086·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Louis AUERBACH, Alex Ben Auerbach, Max Leibowitz, Samuel Denner, Rosalind Trading Corporation, Wilson Warehouse Corporation, Harry Dressbold, Kalman Tenner, Louis Leibowitz, Sol H. Bernstein, John Doe, and Richard Roe, Appellants.
No. 282.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 2, 1931.
David P. Siegel, of New York City (Milton B. Seasonwein, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Max Leibowitz.
• Abraham I. Menin, of New York City, for appellant Louis Leibowitz.
David V. Cahill, of New York City, for appellant Sol H. Bernstein.
Leo H. Klugherz, of New York City, for appellant Harry Dressbold.
Cohen & Haas, of New York City (Emil M. Haas and Herman M. Melitzer, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Denner.
Robert E. Manley, of New York City. (Thomas J. Todarelli, of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before L. HAND, CHASE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.