Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elmer Smith et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v. The King of Arizona Mining & Milling Company et al., 1909 — 214 U.S. 531 · caselaw · US
General
Elmer Smith et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v. The King of Arizona Mining & Milling Company et al.
214 U.S. 531·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 195.
Elmer Smith et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v. The King of Arizona Mining & Milling Company et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona.
April 27, 1909.
Mr. J. F. Conroy for appellants.
Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.