Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Metropolitan Edison Co. et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al., 1982 — 459 U.S. 966 · caselaw · US
General
Metropolitan Edison Co. et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al.
459 U.S. 966·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-2399.
No. 82-358.
Metropolitan Edison Co. et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motions of Atomic Industrial Forum, American Mining Congress, and Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 219 U. S. App. D. C. 358, 678 F. 2d 222.