Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants, v. Aiden STOCKMAN, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 950 · caselaw · US
General
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants, v. Aiden STOCKMAN, et al.
139 S. Ct. 950203 L. Ed. 2d 129·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants,
v.
Aiden STOCKMAN, et al.
No. 18A627.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 22, 2019.
Application for stay presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court granted, and the District Court's December 22, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.
Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.