General
Jack Rouse, et al. v. Charles H. O'Neill, et al.
133 Colo. 96292 P.2d 196·Colorado Supreme Court·1956·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 17,642.
Jack Rouse, et al. v. Charles H. O’Neill, et al.
(292 P. [2d] 196)
Decided January 9, 1956.
Mr. Richard Downing, Mr. John H. Robison, for plaintiffs in error Rouse, Simmons and Robison.
Mr. Clifford W. Mills, pro se and for plaintiffs in error Mathews and Savery.
Mr. Louis A. Hellerstein, for defendant in error O’Neill.
Mr. Richard H. Shaw, for defendant in error Lion Oil Company.
Mr. Raymond J. Gengler, for defendants in error Baumgartner, Gaddis, Williams, Ferguson, Dodson, Gengler and Stiner.
En Banc.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed without written opinion.
Mr. Justice Moore not participating.